Altas Strength 3058G Smith Machine Home Gym with Dual Weight Review
Our verdict
The Altas Strength 3058G Smith Machine Home Gym costs $3,999 and holds a 4.1-star average across 45 reviews, more review volume than most Smith machines in this price range. That review count signals an established buyer base rather than a niche listing, making it a reasonable pick for anyone furnishing a dedicated home gym room around a dual weight stack system.
Check price on AmazonBest for
Best for lifters who want a dual weight stack Smith machine as the centerpiece of a dedicated home gym room, and who value a track record of 45 reviews over a brand new, unproven listing at a similar price.
Skip if
Skip it if your budget tops out below $3,999, since the Body Solid package covers basic Smith machine training for $795, a fraction of the price, or if you have no dedicated space for a full-size cage.
- Priced 170% above the category median ($1,479.00 across 73 tracked models)
Our scorecard
-
Owner rating4.1/5
4.1 average across 45 owner ratings
-
Popularity4.5/5
45 owner reviews, more than most models here
The overall score is owner satisfaction weighted by how many reviews back it, so a high rating from few reviews counts for less. The bars below show where this model stands against the other home gym and fitness equipment we track in this category on price, popularity and size. Context, not marks against it, and our read of the data, not a lab test.
Overview
Picture a spare room or garage bay set aside for strength training, with enough ceiling height and floor space for a full Smith cage plus a dual weight stack. That is the buyer this Altas Strength 3058G is built for. At $3,999, it sits in the upper-middle of the Smith machine price range, well above entry-level cages like the Body Solid package at $795 but below the Inspire Fitness SCS Functional Trainer at $6,599.
The 3058G carries a 4.1-star rating across 45 reviews. That review count is the second highest among the Smith machines in this comparison set, trailing only the Marcy SM-4033's 387 reviews. A rating in the low 4s with a meaningful review base usually points to a machine that satisfies most buyers on core function, even if a portion of reviewers flag assembly time or fit-and-finish issues that tend to show up on dual-stack systems with more moving parts.
Against the field, the 3058G undercuts the Inspire SCS cage by $2,600 while offering a similar dual weight stack format, and it costs more than double the Marcy SM-4033 or the Body Solid package, both single-stack designs. For a buyer who wants two independent weight stacks in one footprint without paying Inspire's premium, the 3058G is the logical middle option, provided $3,999 fits the budget for a permanent home gym build.
Pros
- 4.1-star average across 45 reviews, the second most-reviewed Smith machine in this comparison set
- Dual weight stack design gives two independent resistance paths in one cage
- Priced $2,600 below the Inspire Fitness SCS Functional Trainer at $6,599
- Currently listed as InStock, so it is available to order now
- 45 reviews provide more buyer feedback than the Body Solid ($795, 8 reviews) or Inspire SCS ($6,599, 4 reviews) listings
Cons
- At $3,999, it costs more than five times the Body Solid package's $795
- 4.1 stars trails the Marcy SM-4033's 4.4-star average and the Inspire SCS cage's 5.0-star average
- Bought-last-month figure is listed at 0+, so recent purchase momentum cannot be confirmed
- No published weight capacity or dimension specs are listed for this unit, unlike the Marcy SM-4033
Performance notes
The 3058G's defining feature is its dual weight stack, meaning two separate stacks of resistance built into a single Smith machine cage rather than one shared stack. In practical terms, that layout lets two exercises, or two people, load different amounts of resistance at the same time without swapping plates or pins between sets. That is the likely reason its price sits closer to the Inspire SCS Functional Trainer's $6,599 than to single-stack cages like the Body Solid package at $795 or the Marcy SM-4033 at $1,799.99. No published weight capacity, footprint, or stack-weight figures are listed for this ASIN, so buyers comparing floor space or maximum resistance against the Marcy's documented 300-pound user weight and 70-by-84-by-86-inch footprint will need to check the manufacturer listing directly before committing to the $3,999 price.
What buyers say
A 4.1-star average across 45 reviews puts the 3058G in a middle position within this group of Smith machines. It has far more reviews than the Body Solid package (8) or the Inspire SCS cage (4), and its review volume is second only to the Marcy SM-4033's 387. That combination, a moderate rating with a real sample size, usually means the machine performs its core job for most buyers, while the gap between its 4.1 average and the Marcy's 4.4 or the Inspire SCS's 5.0 suggests a slightly higher rate of dissatisfaction, likely tied to the assembly complexity that comes with a dual-stack design. The listed bought-last-month figure of 0+ does not confirm current sales momentum one way or the other.
More from Altas
Similar home gym and fitness equipment to consider
Frequently asked questions
Is the Altas Strength 3058G worth $3,999?
At $3,999, the 3058G costs less than the Inspire Fitness SCS Functional Trainer at $6,599 while adding a dual weight stack that single-stack cages like the Marcy SM-4033 ($1,799.99) and Body Solid package ($795) do not offer. Its 4.1-star rating across 45 reviews suggests it satisfies most buyers, making it a reasonable middle-tier pick for a dedicated home gym.
How does the 3058G compare to the Marcy SM-4033?
The Marcy SM-4033 costs $1,799.99, less than half the 3058G's $3,999, and holds a higher 4.4-star rating across far more reviews, 387 versus 45. The 3058G's advantage is its dual weight stack, where the Marcy uses a single-stack design. Buyers on a tighter budget with simpler needs may prefer the Marcy.
Does the 3058G have enough reviews to trust the rating?
45 reviews is a moderate sample, more than the Body Solid (8) or Inspire SCS (4) listings, though well short of the Marcy SM-4033's 387. That is enough volume to treat the 4.1-star average as a reasonably stable pattern rather than a handful of early reviews.