ToughFit Soft Wall Ball - Medicine Ball Set for Cardio Review
Our verdict
The ToughFit Soft Wall Ball costs $49.99 and holds a 4.6-star average across 178 reviews, matching the AEROMAT 35133's rating while costing less. Marketed for cardio work, it's a reasonably priced option for buyers who want a soft-shell ball rather than a rubber or leather one.
Check price on AmazonBest for
Buyers looking for a softer-shell medicine ball built around cardio-style training rather than heavy-duty slams, especially those who want a mid-priced option below the CAP HHKCS-42 set's $259.99 price tag.
Skip if
Skip it if you need a specific listed weight to plan your training around. The listing doesn't break out an individual weight spec the way the JFIT or Yes4All listings do, so buyers who want that detail upfront should check elsewhere.
- Priced 16% above the category median ($43.10 across 41 tracked models)
Our scorecard
-
Owner rating4.6/5
4.6 average across 178 owner ratings
-
Popularity1.6/5
178 owner reviews, fewer than most models here
The overall score is owner satisfaction weighted by how many reviews back it, so a high rating from few reviews counts for less. The bars below show where this model stands against the other home gym and fitness equipment we track in this category on price, popularity and size. Context, not marks against it, and our read of the data, not a lab test.
Overview
The ToughFit Soft Wall Ball for Cardio is positioned, as its name suggests, around cardio-style training rather than pure strength work. At $49.99, it lands squarely between Champion's $27.99 entry-level ball and the AEROMAT 35133's $69.99, making it a mid-range purchase for someone who wants a softer option without paying the CAP HHKCS-42 set's $259.99.
Its 4.6-star average across 178 reviews ties the AEROMAT exactly and edges past the CAP set's 4.3 stars, though it carries far fewer reviews than Champion's 3,255. That gap in review volume matters because a smaller sample can shift more with just a handful of new reviews, positive or negative, while Champion's rating rests on a much larger and more stable base.
One thing worth flagging: the listing doesn't specify an exact weight the way the JFIT, Yes4All, or RitFit balls in this category do, so buyers who plan their training around a precise number should confirm that detail before ordering. The bought-last-month figure also doesn't show meaningful recent volume, a pattern shared with the JFIT and AEROMAT listings, unlike Champion's 300-plus recent purchases. For buyers who prioritize a soft-shell, cardio-oriented ball and are comfortable with a mid-size review pool, the $49.99 price and 4.6-star rating both look reasonable next to the rest of the field.
Pros
- 4.6-star rating across 178 reviews matches the AEROMAT 35133, one of the highest-rated balls in this comparison
- Priced at $49.99, cheaper than the AEROMAT ($69.99) and far cheaper than the CAP HHKCS-42 set ($259.99)
- Soft-shell design marketed specifically for cardio work, a different use case than rubber slam balls
- Rating beats the CAP HHKCS-42's 4.3 stars despite costing roughly a fifth of the price
- Mid-range price point avoids both the rock-bottom Champion ball and the expensive six-piece CAP set
Cons
- No weight spec listed on this product, unlike the JFIT (18 lbs) or Yes4All (20 lbs) balls in the same category
- 178 reviews is a small fraction of Champion's 3,255, leaving less long-term feedback to draw on
- No bought-last-month figure showing meaningful recent volume, unlike Champion's 300+
- Costs nearly double Champion's MB6 ($27.99) despite a similar overall satisfaction level
- Sold as a single listing with no rack or multi-weight bundle, unlike the CAP HHKCS-42 or RitFit sets
Performance notes
Without a listed weight, the ToughFit ball is harder to slot into a specific training plan than the JFIT or Yes4All listings, which spell out 18 and 20 pounds respectively. What is clear is the positioning: a soft-shell ball built around cardio use, which typically means a design meant for tossing and catching drills rather than heavy floor slams. At $49.99, it sits in a mid-tier price bracket, above Champion's bargain $27.99 ball but well under the AEROMAT's $69.99 and nowhere near the CAP set's $259.99. The 4.6-star rating suggests buyers are generally happy with the build for its intended cardio use, even without a specific weight spelled out up front. Buyers who care about a specific number should look at listings that spell it out clearly before ordering this one.
What buyers say
A 4.6-star average across 178 reviews puts the ToughFit in strong company, tying the AEROMAT 35133 and beating the CAP HHKCS-42's 4.3 stars. The review count, though, is modest, less than a tenth of Champion's 3,255, so the rating rests on a smaller sample than the category leader. There's no bought-last-month figure showing meaningful recent volume, a pattern it shares with the JFIT and AEROMAT listings rather than the higher-turnover Champion ball. Taken together, the pattern suggests a well-liked but lower-volume product, one that satisfies the buyers who do choose it without yet building the review base of the market's top sellers.
Similar home gym and fitness equipment to consider
Featured in
Frequently asked questions
What weight is the ToughFit Soft Wall Ball?
The listing doesn't specify an exact weight, which is unusual compared to other balls in this comparison like the JFIT (18 pounds) or Yes4All (20 pounds). Buyers who need a specific weight for their training plan should confirm this detail directly on the product listing before ordering.
Is the ToughFit a good alternative to the AEROMAT 35133?
They share the same 4.6-star rating, but the ToughFit costs $49.99 versus the AEROMAT's $69.99, making it the cheaper of two nearly identically rated options. The AEROMAT does list a clear 10-pound weight spec, though, which the ToughFit listing does not.
How does the ToughFit's price compare to Champion's MB6?
At $49.99, the ToughFit costs almost double Champion's $27.99, even though both carry similar star ratings. Champion also has a far larger review base at 3,255 versus 178, which may matter to buyers who weigh review volume heavily over price alone when picking between two similarly rated balls.