Ragebby Weighted Vest-2 Weight Vest Review
Our verdict
The Ragebby Weighted Vest-2 is the easy pick for anyone wanting to add resistance to bodyweight training without spending much: 12 pounds of neoprene-wrapped iron sand for $17.99. With a 4.7-star average across 804 reviews and 100-plus buyers a month, it has the volume and rating to back up the low price point.
Check price on AmazonBest for
Best for lifters and runners who want a light weighted vest for walking, bodyweight circuits, or rucking around the neighborhood, and who would rather spend under twenty dollars than commit to a heavier, pricier rig.
Skip if
Skip it if you need serious overload for strength work, since 12 pounds is light next to the 40-pound ZFOsports or 20-pound Amstaff vest. Heavier lifters chasing real loaded-carry numbers will outgrow this vest fast.
- Material Neoprene, iron sand
- Weight 12 Pounds
- Size 12LB
- Color Black
- Priced 50% below the category median ($35.90 across 99 tracked models)
Our scorecard
-
Owner rating4.7/5
4.7 average across 804 owner ratings
-
Popularity3.3/5
804 owner reviews, more than most models here
The overall score is owner satisfaction weighted by how many reviews back it, so a high rating from few reviews counts for less. The bars below show where this model stands against the other home gym and fitness equipment we track in this category on price, popularity and size. Context, not marks against it, and our read of the data, not a lab test.
Overview
Picture strapping on a weighted vest before a Saturday morning walk or a set of push-ups in the garage. That is the use case the Ragebby Weighted Vest-2 is built for. At $17.99, it undercuts every other vest in this category by a wide margin, yet it carries a 4.7-star rating across 804 reviews, a combination that is hard to find at this price.
The vest itself is built from neoprene with an iron sand fill, landing at 12 pounds in black. That places it well below the 40-pound ZFOsports 130240 and the 20-pound Amstaff WV06V20, both of which cost far more, at $68.94 and $152.99. It is closer in spirit to a light cardio add-on than a maximal-load strength tool.
What stands out is demand: 100-plus units bought in the last month, while the pricier ZFOsports and EMPOWER vests show 0-plus for the same window despite thousands of reviews each. Only the Amstaff, at nearly nine times the price, shows comparable recent movement at 50-plus. For anyone who wants a light vest that people are actually buying right now, this is the one with the current momentum.
Pros
- 12 pounds of neoprene and iron sand fill for structured, even weight distribution
- Priced at $17.99, the least expensive vest in this comparison set
- 4.7-star average across 804 reviews, the highest rating among the four vests here
- 100-plus bought in the past month, showing active recent demand
- Black colorway keeps it simple and wearable under a jacket
Cons
- 12 pounds is light if the goal is serious loaded-carry or rucking strength work
- No adjustable weight increments listed, unlike vests built around removable plates
- Neoprene shells generally run warmer than mesh-paneled alternatives, though no ventilation spec is given
- Sizing is fixed to the 12-pound version, so there is no step-up option within the same line
Specifications
| Material | Neoprene, iron sand |
|---|---|
| Weight | 12 Pounds |
| Size | 12LB |
| Color | Black |
Performance notes
A 12-pound vest sits at the light end of the weighted-vest spectrum. Neoprene wraps the iron sand fill, a combination that keeps the weight close to the torso rather than shifting around, which matters more for walking and bodyweight circuits than for lifting. Iron sand fill is typically packed into fixed panels rather than adjustable pouches, so the 12 pounds here is a set number, not a range you can dial up as you progress. Compared to the 40-pound ZFOsports or the 20-pound Amstaff, this vest is aimed at cardio-style loading such as brisk walks, stair climbs, or bodyweight conditioning rather than maximal strength overload. For someone starting out with weighted training, a lighter fixed load like this is often easier to wear correctly and for longer stretches than heavier vests, though at some point a lifter who wants more resistance will need a heavier model instead.
What buyers say
A 4.7-star average across 804 reviews is a strong signal on its own, but the more telling number is 100-plus units bought in the past month. That puts it well ahead of the ZFOsports and EMPOWER vests, both showing 0-plus recent purchases despite carrying thousands of historical reviews, which suggests those listings may have cooled off even as their star ratings remain solid. Only the pricier Amstaff vest shows any comparable recent activity, at 50-plus, and that is at roughly eight times the price. Taken together, the pattern points to a budget vest that is both well-reviewed and actively selling right now, rather than one coasting on an old review count.
Similar home gym and fitness equipment to consider
- Sportneer
Sportneer Weighted Vest Woman: 8lb/12lb/15lb/20lb/25lb Weight Vest for Walking with
$39.99100+ bought last monthView on Amazon
Frequently asked questions
How much does the Ragebby Weighted Vest-2 weigh?
It weighs 12 pounds, built from a neoprene shell filled with iron sand. That places it toward the lighter end of the weighted vests compared here, well under the 40-pound ZFOsports and 20-pound Amstaff options, making it better suited to cardio and bodyweight work than heavy loaded carries.
Is the Ragebby vest a good value at $17.99?
Yes, based on the numbers here. It costs less than a third of the EMPOWER vest and under a tenth of the Amstaff, yet still holds a 4.7-star rating across 804 reviews and 100-plus recent buyers, a combination none of the pricier alternatives currently match.
Should I buy the Ragebby vest instead of the heavier ZFOsports or Amstaff vests?
Only if 12 pounds fits your goal. The ZFOsports offers 40 pounds and the Amstaff 20 pounds for serious loaded work, but both cost far more and show far less recent buying activity, so the Ragebby wins mainly on price and light-load use cases.