Weight Benches Dumbbell Training Bench Fitness Bench Sitting Exercise Chair CMN4Q9 Review
Our verdict
The Weight Benches Dumbbell Training Bench sells for $2,005.33 with zero Amazon reviews and zero recorded purchases last month, a stark contrast to the Marcy SB 350 at $169.99, which moved 100+ units last month with 5,100 reviews averaging 4.4 stars. Without review history or published specs, this price looks impossible to justify against far cheaper, proven benches.
Check price on AmazonBest for
Shoppers with an unusually large budget who want to gamble on a completely unreviewed bench, and who have already ruled out every lower-priced alternative with a documented track record of steady monthly sales and thousands of reviews behind it.
Skip if
Skip this if you want any evidence the bench performs as described. With zero reviews, zero purchases last month, and no published capacity or dimension specs, there is nothing to check, and the $2,005.33 price sits far above proven benches like the Marcy SB 350.
- Priced 155% above the category median ($786.40 across 136 tracked models)
Overview
The Weight Benches Dumbbell Training Bench Fitness Bench Sitting Exercise Chair CMN4Q9 lists for $2,005.33 and shows as In Stock. It carries no star rating, zero reviews, and zero units bought in the last month. For a piece of home gym furniture, that combination of a four-figure price tag and no purchase history is unusual enough to warrant a close look at the numbers before anyone commits.
Compare that to three established flat benches on the market right now. The Body-Solid GFB350B runs $278.30 with a 600-pound capacity and a 3.6-star average across 18 reviews. The Marcy MD389 costs $201.15, weighs 60 pounds, measures 53 inches deep by 66 inches wide by 47 inches tall, and holds a 4.3-star average across 2,000 reviews. The Marcy SB 350, at $169.99, is built from alloy steel, foam, and vinyl, weighs 51 pounds, and has moved 100 or more units per month while maintaining a 4.4-star average across 5,100 reviews. All three cost a small fraction of the CMN4Q9's price, and all three have thousands of data points behind their ratings.
Nothing in the available facts explains why this bench costs roughly ten times more than the best-reviewed alternative in this comparison. With zero reviews and zero recent purchases, there is no review pattern to read at all, and that absence is itself the most telling data point here. Anyone considering this bench should weigh that lack of any track record against the deep, positive review history already stacked up by the Marcy and Body-Solid options.
Pros
- InStock availability means it can ship right away, without the backorder wait that affects some limited-run gym furniture.
- It is marketed as a dual-function piece, combining a dumbbell training bench with a sitting exercise chair design, according to the listing title.
- The CMN4Q9 model code identifies one specific version, which typically means a fixed set of features rather than options that shift across sellers.
- With zero reviews to date, no pattern of specific complaints, like worn padding or wobbly legs, has surfaced yet, though no positive pattern has emerged either.
- At $2,005.33, it is priced well outside the range where cheap materials usually cut corners on stitching or frame gauge, at least on paper.
Cons
- Zero Amazon reviews means there is no buyer feedback at all to confirm the bench holds up under regular use.
- Zero units bought in the last month, versus 100+ per month for the Marcy SB 350, suggests this listing has little to no proven demand yet.
- At $2,005.33, it costs roughly 7 times more than the Body-Solid GFB350B ($278.30) and about 10 times the Marcy SB 350 ($169.99), with no stated capacity or dimensions to justify the gap.
- No material, weight capacity, or dimension specs are listed at all, unlike the Marcy MD389 and Marcy SB 350, both of which disclose exact steel construction, weight, and footprint.
- No star rating exists yet, so there is nothing to compare against the 3.6 to 4.4-star range already established by the three benches it competes with.
Performance notes
Weight bench performance mostly comes down to frame gauge, pad density, and stated weight capacity, and none of those appear in this listing's specs. That is a meaningful gap. The Body-Solid GFB350B publishes a 600-pound capacity, a number serious lifters check before loading a bar. The Marcy MD389 and Marcy SB 350 both list exact material, alloy steel, with foam and vinyl on the SB 350, a bench weight of 60 and 51 pounds, and footprint dimensions down to the inch, letting a buyer confirm it fits their space before ordering. The CMN4Q9 listing includes none of that. Without a capacity rating, there is no way to know how it stacks up against the 600-pound benches already on the market, and without dimensions, fitting it into a home gym is a guess. At $2,005.33, buyers are paying a premium price without the baseline spec sheet that cheaper competitors provide as a matter of course.
What buyers say
There is no sentiment to read yet. Zero reviews and zero recorded purchases last month mean this listing has not generated any buyer feedback, positive or negative, on Amazon. That is a sharp contrast to the Marcy SB 350, which moved 100 or more units last month and has built up 5,100 reviews averaging 4.4 stars, or the Marcy MD389's 2,000 reviews at 4.3 stars. Even the lowest-rated alternative here, the Body-Solid GFB350B at 3.6 stars, has 18 reviews behind that number. A brand-new listing with no sales history is not necessarily a bad product, but at this price point, the absence of any purchase or review pattern is itself the most important signal available to a shopper.
More from Weight
Similar home gym and fitness equipment to consider
Featured in
Frequently asked questions
Is the Weight Benches CMN4Q9 worth $2,005.33?
Based on the facts available, it is hard to justify. It has zero reviews, zero purchases last month, and no published capacity or dimension specs, while the Marcy SB 350 costs $169.99, sells 100+ units monthly, and holds a 4.4-star average across 5,100 reviews. The price gap is not backed by any disclosed advantage.
Why does this bench cost so much more than the Marcy or Body-Solid options?
The listing does not disclose a reason. No weight capacity, material, or dimension specs are given, so there is nothing in the available facts, like a heavier frame or higher capacity, that would explain a price roughly 7 to 10 times higher than comparable flat benches.
Should I wait for reviews before buying this bench?
That is a reasonable approach. With zero reviews and zero purchases recorded last month, there is no buyer feedback to check right now. Established alternatives like the Marcy MD389, with 2,000 reviews at 4.3 stars, already offer that track record at less than one-tenth the price.